Maybe Karmala will have the guts to stop protecting Russia and permit a country to table a resolution in the UN to remove Putin's impostor representatives from UN premises.
Set aside your preconceptions that it will be vetoed or would require a super-majority. That is 33 year old Kremlin disinformation.
Millions of lives, cities and economies have been lost or destroyed, fiddling about this issue while Ukraine burns. It's time to act.
As few as 30 countries could be able to pass the necessary UNGA resolution - a majority present and voting - abstentions do not count. But to vote in favour of continued violation of the UN Charter and to give control over the entire world to a terrorist state sponsoring corruption and wars would be politically impossible for governments once the issue hits the public attention. Not to mention the vast majority of small states to whom the UN should be providing protection from aggression and economic chaos.
The legal way is the preferable way. It will remove Russia's platform and "get out of jail free" hegemony used to run and expand the Kremlin's protection racket and immediately open the legal avenue for NATO together with other countries to intervene legally under UN authority, expel the invaders and enforce a buffer zone in Russia.
Who is Putin going to nuke if the whole world moves together?
Let me know what you think. Have I missed anything?
Maybe Karmala will have the guts to stop protecting Russia and permit a country to table a resolution in the UN to remove Putin's impostor representatives from UN premises.
Set aside your preconceptions that it will be vetoed or would require a super-majority. That is 33 year old Kremlin disinformation.
Millions of lives, cities and economies have been lost or destroyed, fiddling about this issue while Ukraine burns. It's time to act.
I invite you to read my substack which discusses every aspect: an overview with links is at https://x.com/hifromnz/status/1793386231994454043. Or you can start with the video at https://vlp888.substack.com/p/images-russia-and-the-un.
As few as 30 countries could be able to pass the necessary UNGA resolution - a majority present and voting - abstentions do not count. But to vote in favour of continued violation of the UN Charter and to give control over the entire world to a terrorist state sponsoring corruption and wars would be politically impossible for governments once the issue hits the public attention. Not to mention the vast majority of small states to whom the UN should be providing protection from aggression and economic chaos.
The legal way is the preferable way. It will remove Russia's platform and "get out of jail free" hegemony used to run and expand the Kremlin's protection racket and immediately open the legal avenue for NATO together with other countries to intervene legally under UN authority, expel the invaders and enforce a buffer zone in Russia.
Who is Putin going to nuke if the whole world moves together?
Let me know what you think. Have I missed anything?